A Wise Leader Should be Consistent and persistent in his Actions by Ofor-Ofor

-
Consistency and Persistence in Action

This law is to avoid a government of uncertainty. A good leader should not spit out and lick his spittle; and a man of worth should never get up to unsay what he has said unless it is for the interest of the majority. He should be certain about what he believes and consistent in what he says and does.
There is no doubt that true success comes through consistency and persistence in whatever one is doing. The two destroy resistance or obstacles.
Every policy of government affects people; some positively, others negatively which will definitely attract mixed reactions. A leader faces everyday pressure, especially from those his policies do not favour.  If he is not determined, he will be pushed left and right by these people.
He must remain persistent in his initial decision insofar as it is for the interest of the majority. It should also be noted that the interest of the nobles should not be played with to some extent. If his policy should affect the interest of the nobles, it should be in incremental manner, which is gradual.
A good leader should never say what he cannot do, or undo what he has done; otherwise, he will lose honour among his followers. And the greatness of a leader depends on his triumph over obstacles and oppositions. He who wants to be successful should obey this rule.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CONCEPT OF COMMODIFICATION OF LABOUR

-
COMMODIFICATION OF LABOUR      Commodification of labour is the transformation of human labour or power into commodity which can be sold and bought. It is one of the characteristics of capitalism.  In a capitalist society, there are two broad classes: class who owns the means of production (bourgeoisie or the haves) and class who does not own the means of production (proletariat or the have-nots).      Hence, for those who do not own the means of production to survive they have to sell their labour power to those who have the means of production. In other words, they have to be employed and work for those who own the means of production as workers so that the owner of industry can exploit their labour power and pay them salaries or wages for their services depending on the monetary value of their labour. Therefore, they have sold or commodified their labour power in exchange for salaries or wages.      As Claude Ake (1981), rightly observes that the exchange between the buyers (em
Read more

1953 Kano Riot: Causes and Implications by Andrew Oforma Eze

-
            1953 Kano Riot      Kano riot was a political crisis mainly between northerners and southerners in ancient city of Kano in May 1953. The nature of the riot was clashes between Northerners who were opposed to self-government and Southerners made up of the Yorubas and the Igbos under the aegis of the Action Group (AG) and the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroon (NCNC) who supported self-government for Nigeria in 1956. The political riot lasted for four days.  Many lives were lost and many persons were wounded. The Causes of 1953 Kano Riot The immediate cause of the crisis was the motion of self-government moved in the Federal House of Representatives by a member of Action Group (AG) Chief Anthony Enahoro in 1953 on the need for Nigeria to attain self-government in 1956 from British imperial masters. The Northern representatives under the aegis of the Northern People's Congress (NPC) did not accept the motion on the ground that the north will not be ready f
Read more

CENTRE-PERIPHERY / DEPENDENCY THEORY

-
CENTRE-PERIPHERY / DEPENDENCY THEORY     This is a theory that explains the structural inequalities between western or developed countries like the United States, Germany, China, France, Canada etc., and the underdeveloped or poor countries like Nigeria, Sudan, Niger, Iraq, Haiti, Kenya, Somalia, Mali, Central Africa Republic, etc.      This theory or model divides the world into two unequal poles namely: the centre nations and the periphery nations. The centre nations are the advanced or developed countries while the periphery nations are the under developed or poor countries. Hence, the theory explains that the centre nations, through imperialism and colonialism lured the periphery nations into the capitalist world (mode of production) which they (peripheries) do not know how to operate or to capitalize effectively and rationally. Due to the ignorance of periphery nations on how to run or manage capitalist economy, they wholeheartedly depend on the imperialist nations who use the
Read more